Euro 2012 a political headache for Ukraine

Yesterday at 15:48 | Associated Press

Euro 2012 a political headache for Ukraine
A supporter of former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko holds a poster of her in front of a state-run hospital in Kharkiv, Ukraine, Wednesday May 9
The June Euro 2012 football championship was Ukraine’s chance to shine: forge closer ties with the West, boost its international standing and aid its struggling economy.

Instead, it’s turned into a major headache.

In a move reminiscent of the Cold War, top EU officials have vowed to boycott matches held in Ukraine over the alleged mistreatment of jailed former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. Critics warn that fans may be put off by exorbitant Ukrainian hotel prices and that the cash-strapped government has endangered the country by spending as much as $14 billion on the championship.

“This was a chance to show off the country because a thousand journalists will come here” said Oleh Rybachuk, a member of Tymoshenko’s first Cabinet who has turned into a civic activist. “Now those thousand journalists will come and write about a million problems.”

“The image, political and economic benefits — I don’t see any,” Rybachuk said.

Ukraine was awarded the Euro 2012 championship along with neighboring Poland in 2007 in a decision meant to reward and promote the two football-loving ex-Communist Eastern European countries, with Poland already a proud member of the EU and Ukraine aspiring to join. Back then, the Ukrainian economy was booming and the West was infatuated with the country after the 2004 pro-democracy mass protests known as the Orange Revolution brought to power a pro-Western government.

Ukraine is an entirely different story today.

Tymoshenko, the charismatic blond-braided Orange Revolution heroine and the top opposition leader, is serving a seven-year prison sentence for abuse of office. Western countries decried the conviction last year as politically motivated persecution by the regime of President Viktor Yanukovych, whose fraud-tainted election victory Tymoshenko helped overthrow in 2004.

Tymoshenko on Wednesday ended a hunger strike she launched nearly three weeks ago after prison guards allegedly folded her in a bedsheet and punched her in the stomach, as she screamed for help. She was already suffering from debilitating back pain.

Photographs of large bruises on Tymoshenko’s abdomen and arms released by the country’s top human rights official, shocked the international community and prompted top EU officials, including European Union President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, as well as the governments of Austria and Belgium to cancel plans to attend football matches in Ukraine. German Chancellor Angela Merkel suggested she would only visit Ukraine during the championships if Tymoshenko’s treatment improves.

“The lack of senior foreign officials attending the tournament is embarrassing for Yanukovych’s government and will continue to generate bad press for the country,” said Alex Brideau, a Ukraine analyst at Eurasia Group, a U.S.-based firm that advises on geopolitical risk.

In a further embarrassment, Ukraine had to cancel a regional cooperation forum of central and eastern European states after more than a dozen leaders refused to attend over the Tymoshenko case.

<a href=’http://oadsrv.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=ad03f7b8&cb=0.16628462655069354′ target=’_blank’><img src=’http://oadsrv.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=32&cb=0.3631753353986875&n=ad03f7b8′ border=’0′ alt=” /></a>

Financially, the country is also in a bad shape.

The global financial crisis nearly destroyed Ukraine’s economy, causing gross domestic product to plunge some 15 percent in 2009 and it has not fully recovered. A $15.6 billion rescue loan from the International Monetary Fund has been frozen for over a year due to Yanukovych’s reluctance to carry out unpopular austerity measures.

In this situation many wonder if Ukraine can afford Euro 2012.

The government says it has spent some $4.3 billion (€3.3 billion) on building stadiums and upgrading roads and rail transport for the championship, but total figures that would include construction of government-subsidized hotels, promotional campaigns and staff training have not been released.

The Kiev-based consultancy Davinci Analytic Group estimates that Ukraine will spend a total of least $14 billion on hosting the championship, most of it coming from government coffers. The group estimates that up to $8 billion of that amount will not be returned in the medium term, as tourism is unlikely to significantly rise after the championship. Co-host Poland will spend even more — 95 billion zlotys ($29 billion, € 22 billion) on upgrading its infrastructure to host the event, according to official figures, but 40 percent of that will be covered by EU funds.

“This is a staggering amount of money to spend on the European championship,” Simon Chadwick, professor of sport business strategy and marketing at Coventry University, said of Ukraine. He added that much wealthier Britain will spend some 10 billion pounds ($16 billion) on the summer Olympics in London.

“In terms of economic returns, was that the best way to spend the money?”

Ukraine’s top UEFA official disagrees.

“I am convinced that Ukraine needs this project very much,” said Markian Lubkivsky, director of UEFA Euro 2012 in Ukraine. “We are getting integrated into the European community … this is a geopolitical project.”

“We are going to be left with modern infrastructure … we are going to receive lots of guests and I hope that many of them will visit our country in the future.”

Chadwick, however, pointed out that Greece, now in deep financial crisis, hosted the 2004 Summer Olympics but then failed to ensure that the expensive stadiums and training facilities were used beyond the games. The Davinci group estimates Greece’s financial losses from the Olympics at $4 billion.

“The evidence tends to suggest that the stadiums tend to stay and rust,” Chadwick said.

Opposition lawmaker Ostap Semerak from Tymoshenko’s party has accused the government of embezzling up to $3.7 billion (€2.8 billion), by subcontracting friendly firms at inflated prices and then getting kickbacks.

A recent promotional video commissioned by the government caused a stir when it became known that the 30-second clip cost $160,000 in taxpayers’ money and still ended up as an embarrassment. Critics sneered at the video, in which a group of Ukrainians who will help host the championship are shown learning English and making a blatant grammar error.

Ukraine has already gotten some bed press. UEFA chief Michel Platini has complained of hotel price gouging and called on the government to stop “bandits and crooks” from ripping off fans.

Even a humorous TV ad in the Netherlands has caused controversy over Euro 2012.

A Dutch energy company recently aired an ad that advises women to keep their husbands from attending the Euro 2012 because they are likely to be seduced by Ukraine’s attractive women. Kiev protested the ad as “humiliating and discriminatory.”

Monika Scislowska contributed to this report from Warsaw.

EU leaders to shun Euro 2012 in Ukraine over political persecution

EU leaders to shun Euro 2012 in Ukraine over political persecution
Ukraine President Viktor Yanukovych (L) speaks as EU Commission Chairman Jose Manuel Barroso listens during their press conference following their talks in Kyiv on Dec, 19, Barroso and EU leaders announced on May 3 they would protest political persecution in Ukraine by boycotting the Euro 2012 football championship games played in Ukraine between June 8-July 1,2012 .

Today at 00:05 | Kyiv Post The European Union announced on Thursday that its leadership would shun Euro 2012 European football championship games held in Ukraine this June-July, marking the strongest sign yet that the former Soviet republic was sliding towards isolation amidst concerns over political persecution.

The decision, announced in a Facebook posting the EU delegation office to Ukraine, adds to international pressure on President Viktor Yanukovych to release jailed opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko and reverse a broader rollback on democracy.

Yanukovych has pledged to steer Kyiv towards closer relations with the EU since narrowly beating Tymoshenko in a 2010 presidential contest. But he has been under fire since last year’s jailing of Ms Tymoshenko and prosecutions against other opposition figures seen as an attempt to sideline political rivals.

Yanukovych continues to steadfastly deny such accusations, but EU officials have been ratcheting up pressure on him.

EU President Jose Manuel Barroso “has no intention of traveling to Ukraine or attending Euro 2012 events in Ukraine,” the EU statement reads.

According to the statement, “this position is shared” by all EU commission ministers. They remain deeply concerned about the state of “rule of law in Ukraine.”

“These concerns are well known and have been expressed several times. No-one can be in doubt about the EU’s position on the untenable situation of Yulia Tymoshenko,” the statement adds.

In another blow for Yanukovych, the presidents of Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Estonia, Germany, Italy and Slovenia announced in recent days that they would shun a May 11-12 summit in Ukraine hosted by him.

Notorious for its cuthroat politics and widespread corruption, Ukraine hoped that co-hosting the Euro 2012 games this June-July along with neighboring Poland would showcase the nation’s brighter side.

Nearly $8 billion has been invested into the nation in the years running up to the games to revamp aging infrastructure, building new airports, stadiums and hotels. A boycott could be a painful blow to the nation’s image and humiliating politically for Yanukovych, whose popularity has plunged. His Regions Party risks losing control over parliament during an October election.

EU leaders have stressed that they would not boycott all Euro 2012 games, clarifying that they would attend games hosted by Poland.

Ever since last autumn’s jailing of Tymoshenko, a former prime minister and leader of the 2004 Orange Revolution, EU leaders have warned Kiev that political persecutions and regressions from democracy could jeopardize closer relations, namely ratification of free trade and association agreements.

“The above does not mean a review of our policy regarding Ukraine. We remain ready to continue engaging with the Ukrainian authorities – but we are requesting from them a commitment towards democratic values and rule of law,” the EU said in the May 3 statement.

On Thursday, however, Ukrainian officials remained defiant.

In a statement, foreign ministry spokesperson Oleksandr Dykusarov said Ukraine considers it “destructive to politicize sporting events which have from the oldest of times played an important role in establishing international understanding and unity.” “Calls for a boycott of the championship in practice will undermine the image of this grandiose sporting event and damage the interests of millions of average Ukrainians who vote for various parties, or who are not at all interested in politics. Those who aim to turn Euro 2012 into a target are not helping to reform Ukraine’s justice system and are not helping to strengthen democratic institutions and rule of law in Ukraine,” Dykusarov said.

 

Andriyivsky Uzviz destruction causes more protests

Apr 23 at 15:02

The controversial reconstruction of Kyiv’s historical Andriyivsky Uzviz
saw a further twist on April 10 when buildings owned by Rinat Akhmetov,
the country’s richest man, were demolished.

The destruction caused uproar, bringing hundreds of Kyivans onto the
street in a protest outside the office of Akhmetov’s System Capital
Management holding on April 11.

By April 12, Akhmetov had backed off plans to construct a multistory
business center in the buildings’ place, promising instead to build a
cultural center and restore the facades.

Despite the rare civil society victory in thwarting Ukraine’s powerful
oligarchs, many city residents were unconvinced by Akhmetov’s promises and
decided to keep pressuring municipal authorities and the rich owners of
Andriyivskyi Uzviz buildings with another protest.

On Saturday, April 21st several hundred people came to Mykhailvska square
to protest the demolition of the former Yunist factory buildings on
Andriyivskyi Uzviz and to show their disapproval of the way one of the
city’s most ancient city is being reconstructed.

Several Ukrainian music bands showed up to support the initiative,
including famous Ukrainian folk band Dakha-Brakha, leaders of Ukrainian
rock-band TNMK and Murik from the Green Grey band, which won fame during
the Orange Revolution. Opposition politicians from the far right party
Svoboda and Wladimir Klitschko-led UDAR party, reportedly one of the
protest organizers, also attended.

The protest and small concert lasted for more than two hours despite the
rain. After the rally on Mykhailivska square the protesters marched down to
Kyiv city administration building, promising to protect ancient Kyiv from destruction and
keep their voices heard.

Daryna Shevchenko
Read more: http://www.kyivpost.com/gallery/album/1136/#ixzz1tFToaJm4

Tymosheko shows bruises

 

These are pictures of Ukrainian Ex-Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko that have been taken by a representative of Ukrainian Human Rights Commissioner during a visit to her prison cell on April 24. In the pictures Tymosheko shows bruises on her stomach and her elbow. They appeared on Yulia Tymoshenko Facebook page on April 27. She claimed that she was dragged off to a hospital against her will on April 20, where she refused treatment. Tymoshenko then declared a hunger strike after she was returned to her prison cell in Kharkiv. She claims to have been wrapped in a sheet, punched in the stomach, and dragged out of her cell to the hospital. The allegations are denied by prison officials. President Viktor Yanukovych ordered Ukraine’s General Prosecutor to investigate the case. (Yulia Tymoshenko Facebook account)

German president scraps Ukraine trip over Tymoshenko

German president scraps Ukraine trip over Tymoshenko
German President Joachim Gauck has cancelled a planned visit to Ukraine next month, a spokesman said, amid growing concerns over the health and treatment of jailed former Ukrainian prime minister Julia Tymoshenko.

BERLIN- German PresidentJoachim Gauckhas cancelled a planned visit toUkrainenext month, a spokesman said, amid growing concerns over the health and treatment of jailed former Ukrainian prime ministerJulia Tymoshenko.

Germany has been particularly critical of Ukraine over theTymoshenko case, which has badly strained relations between the former Soviet republic and the 27-nationEuropean Union that it aspires to join.

Berlin has offered to treat Tymoshenko, who suffers from acute back pain, in a German hospital, an offer it repeated on Wednesday. It also expressed concern over reports that prison guards beat her during her recent forced move to hospital.

Gauck, a former human rights activist from communist East Germany, had been due to attend a gathering of central European heads of state in the Black Sea resort of Yalta in mid-May.

“The president will not now visitUkraine,” a spokesman said.

The Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily said Gauck, whose role is largely ceremonial, took the decision after consulting German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Tymoshenko, 51, has been on hunger strike since last Friday when she said she was assaulted by the guards. Prison authorities have said she may be force-fed.

Tymoshenko, the main political rival of President Viktor Yanukovich, is serving a seven-year prison term in the city of Kharkiv following an abuse-of-office conviction described by many in Europe as poltically motivated.

Despite Germany’s strongly critical stance on theTymoshenko case, Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle this week ruled out a boycott of the European soccer championship that Ukraine is due to co-host with its EU neighbour Poland this summer.

Read more: http://www.kyivpost.com/news/politics/detail/126642/#ixzz1tA6LA3G1

EU demands visit to jailed Tymoshenko

EU demands visit to jailed Tymoshenko
The European Union has asked Ukrainian authorities to let its ambassador visit jailed opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko following allegations she was beaten by prison guards, the EU’s foreign policy chief said on April 26. AP

BRUSSELS – The European Union has asked Ukrainian authorities to let its ambassador visit jailed opposition leader Yulia Tymoshenko following allegations she was beaten by prison guards, the EU’s foreign policy chief said on April 26.

Tymoshenko has been on hunger strike since April 20, when she said she was punched in the stomach and dragged from her bed during a forced move to a hospital – an accusation jail authorities deny. Prison officials warned her on April 24 that she could be force-fed.

The 51-year-old was jailed last October for seven years for abusing her power as prime minister in a case described by many in Europe as politically motivated.

Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, said Ukraine had an obligation “to examine promptly and impartially any complaints of torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment”.

Her office said in a statement “The High Representative asks the Ukrainian authorities to allow the EU ambassador, accompanied by independent medical specialists, to visit Ms Tymoshenko in prison.”

The request came a day after Ukraine’s top human rights official called for a criminal investigation into Tymoshenko’s claims and said the alleged treatment could amount to torture.

Tymoshenko’s conviction strained the relationship between Ukraine and the European Union and the alleged prison treatment could further worsen relations.

German President Joachim Gauck late on April 24 cancelled a planned visit to Ukraine next month amid growing concern over the health and treatment of Tymoshenko.

The European Union agreed in March the details of a deal with Ukraine to establish greater political and economic integration, including a free trade agreement – but the deal will be signed only if the political climate in Kyiv becomes more “European”.

A senior EU official said at the time the Tymoshenko case was “the tip of the iceberg”, and that Ukraine would need to make its judicial process in general more impartial.

If the EU ambassador is denied access to Tymoshenko, or finds evidence of mistreatment during a visit, the signing of the agreement is even less likely.

The EU commissioner in charge of enlargement, Stefan Fule, wrote on Twitter on April 24 that the case was a “visible and painful stain on Ukraine”.

Germany has offered to provide medical treatment for Tymoshenko. She has been suffering from back pain for months and has trouble walking, her lawyers and family say.

Tymoshenko, the main political rival of President Viktor Yanukovich, was jailed after a court ruled she exceeded her powers as prime minister when forcing through a 2009 gas deal with Russia.

She led the 2004 Orange Revolution which doomed Yanukovich’s first bidfor the presidency. She has since served twice as prime minister but lost the 2010 presidential vote to Yanukovich in a close run-off.

 

Read more: http://www.kyivpost.com/news/politics/detail/126658/#ixzz1tA4bfZjl

Ukraine rape scandal victim Oksana Makar dies : Bigwig crime

Oksana Makar Oksana Makar had suffered extensive burns and damage to her lungs

An eighteen-year-old Ukrainian woman has died in hospital, weeks after a brutal sexual assault that prompted a campaign against political corruption.

Oksana Makar was attacked in the southern city of Mykolayiv on 8 March by three men who raped her and tried to strangle her before setting her alight.

Three men were arrested, but two – whose parents had political connections – were released without charge.

They have since been re-arrested, after the case prompted a national outcry.

Two have been charged with gang rape and one with rape and attempted murder.

Ms Makar lost consciousness after her attackers abandoned her at a construction site and set fire to her.

She was eventually found the next morning by a stranger and taken to hospital in Mykolayiv with 55% burns.

‘Heinous crime’

Continue reading the main story

Analysis

Oleg Karpyak BBC Ukrainian


Oksana Makar’s murder has prompted Ukrainian society to confront what have become known as “bigwig crimes” – offences committed by the children of public officials and, at times, by officials themselves.

As a rule, they are either given a suspended sentence or escape punishment entirely.

In January, Roman Landik, a member of Luhansk city council and the son of a Ukrainian MP, was sentenced to three years probation for punching a girl in a Luhansk restaurant.

Protesters across Ukraine are demanding justice and an end to legal abuses by “bigwigs”.

President Viktor Yanukovych has instructed Ukraine’s attorney general to investigate the case.

She was transferred to a specialist unit in the eastern city of Donetsk because of the severity of her burns and damage to her lungs.

Doctors at the hospital’s burns centre said her heart had stopped because of bleeding in her lungs and she died after repeated attempts to resuscitate her.

Interior Minister Vitaly Zakharchenko has stated that the parents of two of the suspects are former government officials in the Mykolayiv area.

Ukrainian media have shown footage of one of the three suspects describing to police how Ms Makar was attacked in a flat in the city and then wrapped in a blanket and left in a pit.

The Kiev Post described the attack as “one of Ukraine’s most heinous crimes in recent years”.

There have been several protests in Mykolayiv and elsewhere in Ukraine, including Odessa and Kharkiv.

Some old problems remain at new US Embassy in Kyiv

Some old problems remain at new US Embassy in Kyiv
Apart from looking like a vast military bunker, the new U.S. Embassy in Kyiv still has problems to solve despite improvements. Olena Abramovych

Some old problems remain at new US Embassy in Kyiv

Today at 16:04 | Olena Abramovych

Apart from looking like a vast military bunker, the new U.S. Embassy in Kyiv still has problems to solve despite improvements.

At least that’s the assessment of some visitors and visa seekers who have already been to the brand new, $247 million complex which opened in January on 4.5 hectares of land.

Long lines outside the consular office and unfriendly staff are among the most common complaints, compounding what some Ukrainians say are inexplicable rejections of their visa applications.

However, embassy officials say that several improvements have been made. The consulate service used to have seven windows for processing applications while now the number is 25. This has reduced the average waiting time from four hours to one or even less. Some people who end up waiting for hours simply arrive too early for their appointments, said James Wolfe, the embassy’s spokesman.

But Tamara Martsenyuk said she didn’t notice any improvements during her Jan. 31 visit. Martsenyuk said she received a call from the embassy staff telling her to come to the consulate at least 15 minutes early. She ended up standing for an hour in sub-zero cold before she was allowed in.

“I cannot imagine that they do this for their citizens in the United States – keeping people outside for hours in the frost, rain or snow,” says Martsenyuk, who applied for a visa to study.

Considering that applicants pay at least $140 as an application fee – which guarantees nothing – Martsenyuk asked: “Can’t they give at least a small room? I think I got very bad service.”

Located on Tankova street close to Kyiv’s northern outskirts, the new complex brings together all operations that had earlier been split across various sites. Green Card applicants can now have their documents processed in Ukraine, rather than being forced to travel to Warsaw, as before.

Wolfe says that “the new embassy compound’s consular section features large, comfortable waiting rooms, as well as a covered garden area for optional use in warmer weather. The waiting room has more conveniences, such as two small play areas for children and a baby changing room.”

But before getting to the waiting room, applicants are subjected to a rigorous security check. This is where it takes them an hour to queue.

“It’s treating people like animals,” said Nataliya Trach, a manager who says she waited for hours during the cold wave that hit Ukraine last winter.

Martsenyuk thinks that all the problems are preventable and points to the British Embassy as a place to emulate.

She says the procedure there is well-designed, and the embassy provides a place to keep personal belongings safely, unlike the U.S. Embassy, which bans bulky items and personal computers, but provides no storage for them. Most applicants come from outside Kyiv and carry their belongings with them.

Wolfe said the embassy cannot provide lockers because the guards would have to inspect them, prolonging the waiting time. But three months on, these problems have been addressed by entrepreneurs who installed a kiosk with lockers, offering to store personal items for a Hr 25 fee. Hot tea and coffee are also sold for Hr 6.

Apart from problems with procedures, visitors complain about staff.

“I was shocked when a visa officer spoke to me in Russian with an American accent,” Martsenyuk recalls. She says the officer insisted on speaking Russian, despite the fact that she speaks English.

“I am a Ukrainian speaker in Ukraine where Ukrainian is a state language. I speak Russian very rarely,” Martsenyuk said. She concluded that the whole process speaks poorly of the officers’ training.

Trach, who visited the old embassy a year ago, had a different complaint: “By default, they treat you like a criminal.”

She was denied a visa. When she attempted to clarify the reason, she said the visa officers shut the window in front of her face. “This is rudeness. I paid $140 and wasn’t given more than a minute of time,” she says.

Visa applicants say that ill treatment, as well as lack of appeal possibilities, leaves the impression that the process of granting visas is non-transparent and that visa officers have excessive powers.

Anna Lysyuk said that she can’t understand why she was refused a visa, even though she has been to America twice. She was only asked two questions: whether she has been to the U.S. before and whether she was married. She felt she got a denial because she said no to the latter.

“I am not satisfied with the pre-judgment that if I am single, it means that I am going there to marry,” Lysyuk says. “I am a professional.”

American officials are empowered by law to keep out people who are considered at high risk of overstaying their visas or running afoul of other American laws. The burden of proof is on the applicant. However, Wolfe notes that denial “is by no means permanent” and the person can reapply again.

If the applicant is “able to prove that he or she has no intention of abandoning his or her residence,” then the person will receive a visa, Wolfe said.

With respect to refusals, the U.S. Embassy says that most Ukrainians applying for non-immigrant visas receive an explanation.

“For those who do not, there are several possible grounds of refusal, the most common of which is lack of sufficient information or the applicants’ failure to overcome the law’s presumption that they intend to immigrate to the United States or work without permission,” Wolfe explained.

Kyiv Post staff writer Olena Abramovych can be reached at obramovych@kyivpost.com.

The president’s home office at Mezhyhiriya

Cartoon

Mar 2 at 10:43

The Kyiv Post is hosting comments and forums to foster lively debate. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. If you think that a posted comment violates these standards, please flag it and alert us. We will take steps to block violators.

Nine billionaires among Ukraine’s 30 richest men

by Zenon Zawada

Kyiv Press Bureau

KYIV – Ukraine now boasts nine billionaires, all having prospered from the nation’s vast natural resources and the industrial might inherited from the Soviet Union, according to a newly released survey of Ukraine’s 30 wealthiest men.

Among them, 17 conduct their business in the industrial east, while none are based in western Ukraine, as determined by the financial analysts at Dragon Capital investment bank and editors of KP Media, who published their report in the July 1 issue of Korrespondent magazine.

“If more than half of the wealthy in neighboring Russia scraped together their fortune exporting natural resources, mainly natural gas and oil, then most well-off Ukrainians made their millions producing steel and cast iron,” reported Korrespondent magazine, Ukraine’s leading news weekly, which is published by American Jed Sunden in the Russian language.

The rich have gotten richer in Ukraine thanks to the Orange Revolution – an event that increased the attractiveness of their properties, assets and stocks among Western investors and capitalists, Korrespondent reported.

One of the top beneficiaries of this newfound luster is one of the Orange Revolution’s enemies, Rynat Akhmetov, 39, whose wealth has multiplied to an estimated $11.8 billion.

He remains the biggest financier of the Party of the Regions, which he represents in Ukraine’s Parliament as a national deputy.

Known as Ukraine’s steel king, Mr. Akhmetov also has enormous investments in the auto-making, energy, communications and finance industries, Korrespondent reported.

His holding company, System Capital Management (SCM), has become so large that it has recently undergone major restructuring in order to more effectively maintain control of its assets.

In the process, Mr. Akhmetov created Ukraine’s first vertically integrated firm, the holding company Metinvest, which mines raw materials and smelts them into metal and steel products. It has become Mr. Akhmetov’s most profitable enterprise, Korrespondent reported.

He has also created holding companies for his vast energy business, Donbas Fuel-Energy Co., which controls 15 percent of the energy market, as well as his growing insurance and financial empire, SCM-Finance.

Mr. Akhmetov also owns the Donetsk Shakhtar soccer club, which defeated archrival Dynamo Kyiv for Ukraine’s championship this year.

An ethnic Tatar, Mr. Akhmetov is married with two sons. His relations with Crimea’s Tatars is strained, however, because they support the Our Ukraine bloc and oppose pro-Russian political parties.

The remaining three of Ukraine’s four wealthiest people are Dnipropetrovsk businessmen who are active in the city’s Jewish community.

Ukraine’s second wealthiest man is media king Viktor Pinchuk, 45, who became the son-in-law of former President Leonid Kuchma in 2002 when he married his daughter, Elena Franchuk. His wealth is now estimated at $3.7 billion.

He began his investment activity even before the Soviet Union’s collapse, when he founded Interpipe in Dnipropetrovsk in 1990. Besides trading metal, he imported Turkmen and Russian natural gas, Korrespondent reported.

Profit from those activities enabled him to purchase the Nizhnedniprovskyi Tube-Rolling Plant, the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant and the Novomoskovskyi Tube-Rolling Plant, among others.

Mr. Pinchuk’s industrial empire enabled him to build a media empire within Ukraine, which now includes three national television networks, ICTV, STB and Novyi Kanal.

Mr. Pinchuk is known as an avid art collector, creating a three-floor museum of contemporary art in Kyiv’s Mandarin Plaza, Korrespondent reported.

He is also financing a documentary on the Holocaust in Ukraine, based on survivor’s testimonies recorded in the digital archives of the Shoah Foundation for Visual History and Education established by Steven Spielberg in 1994.

Mr. Pinchuk has two daughters.

Another Dnipropetrovsk businessman, Ihor Kolomoiskyi, 42, is Ukraine’s third wealthiest person, also prospering from city’s industrial inheritance from its Soviet past.

He acquired metallurgical, ferroalloy, ore mining and processing plants, also creating for himself a monopoly on Ukraine’s manganese ore, Korrespondent reported.

Vast industrial holdings enabled Mr. Kolomoiskyi to join other Dnipropetrovsk businessmen in launching Ukraine’s largest bank, Pryvat, enabling his wealth to grow to an estimated $2.8 billion.

While piecing together his industrial and financial empire, Mr. Kolomoiskyi has fiercely competed with Mr. Pinchuk, as well as the Donetsk business clans.

Though not known to sponsor any political parties, Mr. Kolomoyskyi is known to have some level of relations with Yulia Tymoshenko, also a Dnipropetrovsk native.

Mr. Kolomoiskyi is married with two children.

Dnipropetrovsk fuel trader and metallurgical industrialist Henadii Boholiubov has amassed a $2.4 billion fortune, ranking him fourth on Korrespondent’s top 30 list.

Mr. Boholiubov is a Pryvat Group partner.

Ukraine’s fifth wealthiest person, Kostiantyn Zhevago, 32, was born in a Siberian village near Magadan.

By the time he was 19 years old, he was already the financial director of Kyiv-based Finances and Credit bank, becoming its administration chair three years later in 1996.

Mr. Zhevago rose quickly in business as a result of contacts he established among Kyiv’s wealthy oligarchs during the 1990s, Korrespondent reported.

While studying at the Kyiv Institute of the National Economy, Mr. Zhevago befriended Serhii Cherep, the son of Valerii Cherep, the director of UkrAgroStoy and Transportation Minister at the time.

During this time, he also established contact with Kyiv millionaires Viktor Medvedchuk and Hryhorii Surkis, as well as the notorious fugitive Ihor Bakai.

Mr. Zhevago acquired his wealth, currently estimated at $1.9 billion, through investments in Poltava mining, truck-manufacturing and pharmaceutical businesses, Korrespondent reported.

Despite his checkered past, which includes allegations of bribing judges, stealing businesses and driving officials to suicide, Ms. Tymoshenko allowed him to represent the Tymoshenko Bloc as a national deputy.

Though not among Ukraine’s wealthiest people, President Viktor Yushchenko has a few allies who made the top 30.

Ukrainian chocolate king Petro Poroshenko, 40, has built a fortune worth $505 million, according to Korrespondent magazine, ranking him 15th on its list.

Unlike most others on the list, Mr. Poroshenko, 40, is clear about how he made his first million.

As an international relations student at Shevchenko State University in Kyiv, Mr. Poroshenko and three other students offered consulting work for external economic activity, for which he received 1.2 million rubles, Korrespondent reported.

He served as assistant general director of the Respublika Union of Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs between 1990 and 1991.

In 1993 he founded the enterprise that would make him rich, Ukrprominvest, a holding company for his Roshen confectionery industry, as well as his automobile and auto parts manufacturing businesses.

He managed to achieve virtually exclusive control of sugar production, as well as to invest in Lutsk and Cherkasy factories, Korrespondent reported.

Like Mr. Zhevago, Mr. Poroshenko had close ties to the Kyiv-based Medvedchuk-Surkis oligarch clan until breaking away in 2001 to team up with Mr. Yushchenko and his Our Ukraine bloc.

He launched the television network 5 Kanal (Channel 5) based on a commitment of giving its reporters freedom to determine editorial policy.

It became among the few media to report the 2004 presidential elections and Orange Revolution without bias.

Mr. Poroshenko is among Mr. Yushchenko’s closest confidantes and played a central role in the president’s decision in September 2005 to dismiss the Cabinet of Ministers.

Ms. Tymoshenko described her conflict with Mr. Poroshenko as the last straw that prompted Mr. Yushchenko to fire his government.

Previously serving as secretary of the National Security and Defense Council under President Yushchenko, Mr. Poroshenko is the parliamentary coalition’s likely nominee for Verkhovna Rada chair.

Born in the town of Bolhrad in the Odesa Oblast, his ethnicity unconfirmed, Mr. Poroshenko is married with four children.

Of Ukraine’s top 30 wealthiest, four are national deputies from the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc, two are from the Party of the Regions and two represent Our Ukraine in the country’s Parliament.

Mr. Yushchenko’s other multi-millionaire ally is 50-year-old Fedir Shpyh, whose wealth is ranked 25th, estimated at $305 million.

At the time of the Soviet Union’s collapse, Mr. Shpyh was managing the finances of the Kyiv Oblast’s Komsomol organization, Korrespondent reported. In 1991 its finances were transferred into Inko Bank, where Mr. Shpyh just happened to be the managers.

In several years, Inko evolved into Ukraine’s second-largest bank, Bank Aval, which Mr. Shpyh and his partners sold to Germany’s Raiffeisen Bank for about $1 billion last year.

He recently launched Prestyzh Bank, which is targeted at handling the financial assets of Ukraine’s elite.

A native of the village of Kobyzhcha in the Chernihiv Oblast, Mr. Shpyh is married with one son. He teamed up with Our Ukraine only in recent years, having been a member of the One Ukraine parliamentary faction prior to the 2006 elections.

He even built a modern soccer stadium for his village, outfitted with an automatic lawn-sprinkling system, running tracks, lockers and parking.

There’s at least one Ukrainian patriot among Ukraine’s wealthiest. Ranked 24th, Oleksander Slobodian’s shares in the Obolon beverage behemoth are estimated at $315 million.

Mr. Slobodian, 50, began working in the beverage factory in 1980 as an engineer, climbing the ladder to become general director in 1993.

Not only a savvy businessman, Mr. Slobodian himself invented the recipe for Zhyvchyk, the popular soda pop, Korrespondent reported.

A national deputy of the Ukrainian People’s Party in the last parliamentary session, Mr. Slobodian provided significant funding for the Kostenko-Pliusch Ukrainian People’s Bloc, which finished in eighth place during the 2006 parliamentary campaign.

Born in Ternopil, Mr. Slobodian is married with a daughter and two sons.

Another noteworthy figure among Ukraine’s wealthiest is Henadii Vasyliev, 52, the pro-Russian politician who has attacked the Ukrainian American diaspora in campaign literature for his Derzhava political party.

Mr. Vasyliev, a Donetsk native who worked for 10 years as a district prosecutor, built his $345 million fortune acquiring metallurgical plants and coal mines, Korrespondent reported.

Billionaire Dmytro Firtash, 40, is ranked eighth, owning assets of $1.4 billion.

Mr. Firtash is the biggest partner in RosUkrEnergo, the shady intermediary firm that purchases natural gas from the Russian Federation and Turkmenistan, and resells it to Ukraine.

He is believed to have close ties with international mobster Semion Mogilevich, a fugitive currently wanted by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations for racketeering, securities fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering.

A link between Mr. Firtash and First Lady of Ukraine Kateryna Yushchenko was alleged by Svoboda, the weekly newspaper published by the Tymoshenko Bloc.

Mr. Firtash allegedly provided the air transportation to Mrs. Yushchenko’s relatives so that they could fly to Kyiv from the U.S. and witness the president’s inauguration.

No women are among Ukraine’s 30 wealthiest people, Korrespondent reported.


Copyright © The Ukrainian Weekly, July 9, 2006, No. 28, Vol. LXXIV


| Home Page |